Federal Executive Actions
This site is kept as up-to-date as possible. Last update: Feb. 21, 2025
Guidance and Latest Updates
Q: Can I reach out to the ˝űÂţĚěĚĂCongressional Delegation or their staff to advocate for continued or uninterrupted federal research funding (or other related topics)?
Short Answer: Yes, but it is highly recommended that you do so using your personal time and resources. Using university time and resources - including your @alaska.edu email - requires additional disclosures and actions to comply with state and federal laws, and if done carelessly, may run afoul of them. For more, view these memos on ethics and political activity, and this guidance on the Federal Lobbying Disclosure Act.
Detailed Answer: First and foremost, all UA system employees have a First Amendment right to petition their elected officials whenever they want. Consistent with that right, employees using their personal time and resources (including personal email addresses) can reach out, describing their personal experiences and impacts as they see fit. It is perfectly fine to say that you work at the University and are receiving federal agency funding when commenting in your personal capacity.
The ˝űÂţĚěĚĂExecutive Branch Ethics Act does not prohibit lobbying efforts by employees using University resources. However, the Office of General Counsel has consistently recommended that employees use personal emails and resources when lobbying for several reasons, among them:
- Compliance with the federal Lobbying Disclosure Act. To comply with the Lobbying Disclosure Act, UA employees who want to reach out in
their official capacity as a University employee with a request for an elected official
to take an action or position regarding any federal matter need to coordinate that
effort with the University’s Federal Relations team.
- For example, if a researcher wants Senator Murkowski to reach out to NSF to urge the
agency to restore cut funding, we recommend contacting us first, as that request will
be considered lobbying, which must be tracked and reported in accordance with the
Federal Lobbying Disclosure Act.
- UA email accounts are also subject to the ˝űÂţĚěĚĂPublic Records Act (ARPA). They may be subject to requests for public records under the APRA and ultimately publicized without our consent in ways that are not consistent with the intent of our message. (Employee use of personal emails for individual outreach to legislators would not be subject to the ARPA.)
For these reasons, it remains the recommendation of the Office of General Counsel that employees use personal resources and time when potentially engaging in lobbying activities.
The Office of General Counsel has specific resources available on its website which
provide some guidance on this topic. These memos can be found here (/counsel/ethics-information/ethics-and-politically-re/index.php).
In addition, employees can obtain more information and guidance on the federal Lobbying
Disclosure Act on the UA Office of Government Relations website here (/govrelations/federal/lda-compliance.php).
Updates to UA’s Notice of Nondiscrimination
February 21, 2025
UA has updated its nondiscrimination statements to be in line with recent federal actions, and to make other adjustments.
The changes clarify that our hiring, admission, and other practices have always been consistent with federal nondiscrimination policies and laws, and won’t result in any substantive changes to our practices or operations.
- A recent federal executive order rescinded EO 11246 (Equal Employment Opportunity) from 1965. Among other things, the order required federal contractors to create affirmative action programs to promote equal employment opportunities.
- The federal executive actions do not repeal or remove the Equal Employment Opportunity Act of 1972, nor should they be confused with it. The 1972 Act is a federal law - amending the Civil Rights Act of 1964 - that prohibits employment discrimination and retaliation.
For more information, visit .
Since January 20, 2025, Executive Orders and other guidance issued represent a shift in federal priorities. These changes can potentially impact awarded projects and those awaiting funding from federal agencies or sponsors. UA’s Federal Relations Team, General Counsel, and senior system leadership are aware of the disruptions that these changes are causing, and we are monitoring the situation as it evolves.
For now, we are business as usual:
- Continue all grant and contract performance as required under the existing terms of awards. Research faculty should continue to follow grant, proposal, or funding deadlines and instructions while remaining prepared to respond to changing agency requirements.
- See additional Agency-Specific Guidance below for more information.
- Continue all normal billing and cost recovery processes, including any agency-required drawdowns or submissions, in a timely manner.
- If an award-specific modification, change order, or termination notice is received by an AOR (authorized organizational representative), engage with your university’s grants and contracts office, as well as university leadership, including general counsel as needed, to determine its impacts.
- While that evaluation is conducted, continue all normal performance and business practices until the regular and compliant process for making the change or termination under the terms of that grant or contract has been completed.
- Pay close attention to any communications you receive from funding agencies.
- Stay in contact and work closely with your university’s grants and contracts office.
Remember that executive orders and guidance memos don’t necessarily have an immediate effect - the impacted agencies must first interpret them, and then provide further guidance to contractors or grantees on their implementation.
- Even then, impacted organizations will likely have a specified period of time to review and comply with those changes in executive guidance.
- While they may be unsettling and create uncertainty, our actions should and will only change once the guidance is clear and is confirmed to be in line with existing federal laws, regulations, and processes.
Finally, if you feel a federal agency is being unreasonable in an award-specific modification, change order, or termination and would like the university to consider reaching out to one of our federal elected officials, please contact the UA Federal Relations Team - John Latini and Denae Benson.
Background:
On January 27, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) issued , which temporarily paused federal grants, loans, and other financial assistance programs. The memo was rescinded on January 29.
A lawsuit brought in federal court by nearly two dozen states challenged the legality of the funding freeze. This lawsuit has proceeded despite the rescission of OMB Memo M-25-13.
On February 3, the court extended a temporary restraining order (TRO) that prevents the federal government from interfering with active awards unless they do so in accordance with the terms of each individual grant, and also prevents agencies from freezing or stopping funding while they review and evaluate current funding. This TRO remains in effect until further notice. Although the language of the TRO is directed at State institutions, the Department of Justice has determined that it applies to all award recipients.
This means that agencies will continue to review existing grants for compliance with recent executive orders. PIs should continue working according to the existing terms of their awards but be prepared to make modifications if requested to do so by the funding agency.
What to Know
Several executive actions from the federal administration concern DEIA. In the short term, blanket orders to stop DEIA work are covered under active temporary restraining orders (TROs) and can’t be executed. Agencies can review individual contracts and attempt to amend or change them in line with executive actions, but those amendments and changes need to have specific definitions and guidance from the federal government on what constitutes DEIA in order for us to make actual determinations about what qualifies.
For non-research-related activities, we are waiting to receive specific definitions and guidance from the federal government on what constitutes prohibited DEIA activities or programs for us to make actual determinations about what current University activities might qualify, and that guidance from the federal government has not yet been provided.
UA Leadership and general counsel’s office are also exploring whether clarifying language on university websites may be necessary to make unambiguous our compliance with state and federal laws, as well as the inclusive nature of our activities. Responsible units will be contacted directly only if such changes are determined to be necessary.
What to Do
Researchers/Research-related activities
- Continue billing, working, and researching as usual. Refer to the appropriate Agency-Specific Guidance below for your funding Agency, if any, as well as any other directions on this page regarding research.
- If you have further questions or concerns, engage with your grants and contracts office and contract administrator for clarity.
- As needed, the grants and contracts offices may seek tailored guidance from the general counsel’s office.
Non-research-related activities
- Continue working as usual.
- If you have specific questions or concerns, reach out to your supervisor or Director, who may engage with the student services vice chancellors and general counsel as needed.
- Watch for further direction from your supervisor or University leadership.
Feb. 10, 2025
Recently, the Trump Administration revoked a long-standing policy that limited immigration
enforcement activities in “protected” or “sensitive” areas, including traditionally
on college campuses. As a result, we may begin to see ICE or other enforcement agencies
(DHS, FBI, etc.) begin to conduct immigration enforcement actions on our campuses.
Unlike other states, ˝űÂţĚěĚĂdoes not have any laws or regulations regarding how individuals
or organizations are to act when approached by federal enforcement agencies. If you
encounter ICE or other immigration enforcement activities on campus, please keep the
following general guidance in mind.
- As public institutions, much of our campuses are “public” spaces that are open to
the public, either 24/7 or during normal business hours. Immigration enforcement agents do not need a warrant or other authorization to be
present in such locations, or to conduct enforcement efforts in such locations, during
times when such spaces are typically open to the general public. If you see such activities in locations that are generally open to the public, please
report that activity to your campus leadership and/or the Office of the General Counsel
(legal@alaska.edu).
- Examples of public spaces may include (non-exclusive):
- Most Campus exterior spaces;
- Libraries;
- Classrooms (other than those in secured access facilities);
- Building foyers and hallways (other than those in secured access facilities);
- Student union or student commons locations; and
- Dining, recreation, and shopping facilities (e.g., bookstores) open to the public.
- Access to private spaces, or any location in which an individual may have a reasonable
expectation of privacy, typically requires a warrant or valid consent for access.
If you receive a request to access private spaces without a warrant, please inform
that individual that they should contact the Office of General Counsel and/or University
Police, where applicable, to obtain consent and/or to arrange access. Avoid making
any comments or promises that might be considered consent to enter. A statement such
as the following would be appropriate in most situations: “I am not authorized by
the University to consent to your access to this location for this purpose. Please
provide me a copy of any warrant or other authorization you have to enter this private
space, so that I can forward them on to someone with the necessary authority.”
- Examples of private spaces may include:
- Individual offices and non-public administrative locations that require access permission or have specific access controls (card or key access);
- Personal residential spaces, such as student housing rooms, other than common areas which may be considered public spaces;
- Locations where confidential services are provided, including, for example, counseling and healthcare examination or limited access spaces;
- Secured research spaces where confidential, restricted, or controlled research is being conducted, unless such spaces are otherwise open to the public on a regular basis;
- Locations where a reasonable expectation of privacy might attach, such as restrooms, locker rooms, lactation spaces, etc.
- If you are presented with a written warrant and ICE or the enforcement agents refuse to wait for you to contact leadership, please do not physically obstruct access and contact the Office of General Counsel (legal@alaska.edu and/or 907-450-8080) and your campus police, if any, immediately.
- If you are unsure about a specific encounter, please contact your campus leadership and/or the Office of the General Counsel for additional guidance and direction.
Grants and Contracts:
Answers to Common Questions & Concerns
- Federal agency submission portals are operational, and we will continue facilitating proposal submissions as usual.
- Proposal review timelines at sponsoring agencies may be extended during the transition period.
- Some federal agencies have canceled posted requests for proposals (RFPs) etc., pending program reviews.
General Information
- The terms and conditions of executed awards remain enforceable, but the ability to invoice and receive reimbursement currently varies. Where possible, work under executed awards should proceed business as usual.
- Formal changes to awards will come through an amendment from the agency for review and execution via your university’s grants and contracts office.
- If there are changes made to research compliance requirements or award reporting requirements, we expect they will be made on a project basis pursuant to the terms of each individual grant or contract, as noted above. Work with your university’s grants and contracts office and General Counsel’s office if necessary to review these changes and determine how to comply with them if necessary.
- If specific programs are terminated or restructured, you may encounter difficulties accessing funds or meeting new criteria. Federal agencies managing these programs will typically issue guidance on how to proceed. Engage with your university’s grants and contracts office for further guidance.
- If a program or initiative is reduced or de-funded, there could be delays or pauses in payments for existing grants under those programs. This is rare, and would only potentially occur if funding for a program is rescinded or redirected.
What to do:
- Review your grant agreement: Ensure you understand the terms, especially clauses related to funding availability and reimbursement.
- Closely monitor budget obligations to avoid overspending award accounts while awaiting anticipated future funding.
- Attempt and document your efforts to communicate with your grant officer: Stay in contact with your program or grant officer to confirm that there are no changes affecting your award.
- Reports and deliverables: Continue to submit required reports and deliverables to your sponsoring agency on time. Prioritize the submission of any materials that may be past due.
- Monitor policy updates: Keep an eye on announcements from the agency overseeing your grant for any updates on funding or compliance updates.
- Review information on your granting agency in the Agency Specific Guidance and Information section below. You may need to review your project. You should be prepared to adapt or make modifications in consultation with your program officer.
- Contact your university’s grants and contracts office if you have questions about compliance with new guidelines or requirements
Agency-Specific Guidance and Information
We continue to monitor agencies for updated information, and will update these sections as we receive new details on the implementation of the policies and priorities of the new administration at individual departments and agencies. PIs are encouraged to sign up for alerts from their sponsoring agency, if available.​
General Information
NSF is working to conduct a comprehensive review of its projects, programs and activities to be compliant with the existing executive orders. NSF grantees to cease all grant and award activities that do not comply with the executive orders. In particular, this may include, but is not limited to any of the following grant activities that use or promote the use of diversity, equity, inclusion and accessibility (DEIA) principles and frameworks:
- Conferences;
- Trainings;
- Workshops;
- Considerations for staffing and participant selection.
Temporary Restraining Orders (TROs) in Washington, D.C., and Rhode Island have been issued in response to OMB Memorandum M-25-13, Temporary Pause of Agency Grant, Loan, and Other Financial Assistance Programs (Jan. 27, 2025) (“OMB Memo”), and related executive orders. While the TROs are in effect, federal agencies cannot pause, freeze, impede, block, cancel, or terminate any awards or obligations based on the OMB Memo, or based on the President’s recently issued Executive Orders.
The TROs do not impact the ongoing review of NSF’s award portfolio to identify active grants in the context of recent Executive Orders. The comprehensive review of NSF’s award portfolio will continue. NSF has restored access to the ACM$ system as of 12:00 PM ET on February 2, 2025, and is in compliance with the TRO.
General Information
On February 10, the District Court of Massachusetts issued a nationwide TRO on the NIH indirect cost rate reduction. This nationwide order prohibits NIH from implementing the ICR change until at least February 21st, when a hearing on a temporary injunction will be held. This is consistent with the timing in a similar case filed by the 22 State AGs that also resulted in a limited TRO. Additional lawsuits have been filed, and it is likely these cases will be combined as the litigation continues. PIs and grants and contracts offices should continue billing NIH as usual at the ICR in their contracts.
The National Institutes of Health (NIH) supplemental guidance on Feb. 7th that lowers the facilities and administration (F&A) indirect cost recovery rate to 15%. The guidance states that it applies to "any new grant issued, and for all existing grants to [institutions of higher education], retroactive to [February 7, 2025]..."
General Information
EPA has issued a statement confirming that there is no pause on activities related to the now-rescinded OMB memo of January 27. In accordance with the January 20 Executive Order on , the agency has paused all funding actions related to the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 and the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act of 2021. Recipients are encouraged to contact their EPA project officer with any questions.
DEIA
A memo was distributed to NASA contractors and grantees outlining initial guidance
in relation to EOs on DEIA. Contractors and grantees are directed to cease any DEIA
activities required by their contracts/grants. Further, contractors/grantees must
notify their Grant/Contract officer if they identify such requirements in their grant/contract.
Grant/Contract officers will begin to contact contractors/grantees directly regarding
required modifications as additional guidance becomes available.
General Information
The Department of Agriculture has temporarily suspended all actions related to grants. All NIFA Funding Opportunities are internally and have been removed from Grants.gov. No timeline has been provided for either the department-wide or NIFA-specific pause.
Payment to National Animal Health Laboratory Health Network (NAHLN) labs has blanket approval exception in place for federal contracts.
General Information
The DoD issued a on Jan. 28 clarifying that the scope of the OMB M-25-13 memo does not include contracts thus DoD has not paused contract awards.
Additionally, TROs in Washington, D.C., and Rhode Island have been issued in response to the OMB Memo, and related executive orders. While the TROs are in effect, federal agencies cannot pause, freeze, impede, block, cancel, or terminate any awards or obligations based on the OMB Memo, or based on the President’s recently issued Executive Orders.
DOD has also they will not use funds to host events related to cultural awareness months.
DEIA
In accordance with the new administration’s orders related to DEIA, the Department
of Education to close DEIA initiatives within the Department and remove outward-facing DEIA resources
from its websites. Further review of Department programs will be ongoing, but the
press release linked above does not address plans for grant or contract amendments
under the new policies or other impacts to research and other grants through the Department.
Communications
Through a memo, Acting Secretary of Energy Ingrid Kolb has ordered a temporary pause on a range of agency actions pending a review of accordance with administration policies and priorities. Actions paused except for approval by the Secretary include:
- Personnel actions
- Procurement announcements and actions
- Funding actions
- Grants, new funding opportunities, etc., will not be announced, approved, finalized, modified, or provided.
- Release of reports, studies, congressional correspondence, and public announcements
- Federal register notices
- Actions under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
- NEPA activities within the agency may continue but will be subject to additional review.
A date has not been provided for when this pause will end. Further, DOE is cancelling all scheduled meetings regarding negotiations of upcoming projects and scheduled reporting of current projects.
DEIA
Pending Department review, the acting secretary has ordered the suspension of:
- Diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) policies, procedures, programs, activities, and reviews involving or relating to DEI objectives and principles until further notice;
- Requiring, using, or enforcing Community Benefits Plans (CBP); and
- Requiring, using, or enforcing Justice40 requirements, conditions, or principles in any loans, loan guarantees, grants, cost-sharing agreements, funding opportunity announcements, contracts, contract awards, or any other source of financial assistance.
See .
Grantees and other recipients and subrecipients of Department funds have been directed to cease any activities and stop incurring costs related to DEI and CBP activities. A January 31 letter from DOE Office of Science (OS) further directed WSU recipients of financial assistance awards from DOE OS have been directed to suspend any activities under their awards related to DEI programs, objectives, or principles; CBPs; Justice40; and Promoting Inclusive and Equitable Research (PIER) Plans.
For new proposals that have already been submitted to the Office of Science, no action on the part of the applicant is required with respect to the now-eliminated PIER plan requirement, but applicants will have the option to resubmit a new application with the removal of the PIER plan.
DEIA
The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)/Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention (CDC) is providing notice of pursuant to a case pending in the U.S. District Court in the District of Rhode Island
to all CDC contractors. This case challenges an alleged “pause” of certain Federal
financial assistance, related to OMB Memorandum M-25-13, Temporary Pause of Agency
Grant, Loan, and Other Financial Assistance Programs (Jan. 27, 2025) (“OMB Memo”).
The TRO prohibits certain actions by HHS and the other defendant agencies and is effective
immediately and until further order of the court. This Notice is being provided pursuant
to the Court’s directive that notice of the order be provided “to all Defendants and
agencies and their employees, contractors, and grantees by Monday, February 3, 2025,
at 9 a.m.”
General Information
National Institutes of Justice has canceled all previously posted Notices of Funding Opportunity and associated webinars.
In response to the Office of Management and Budget Memo, the Court has entered a prohibiting certain actions, which is effective immediately. The Automated Standard Application for Payments (ASAP) is available. DOJ award recipients are able to request a drawdown in ASAP.
General Information
Through a January 29 memo, the Secretary of Transportation a ten-day review of all DOT programs that are implicated by the recent executive
orders related to climate change, greenhouse gas emissions, racial equity, gender
identity, DEI goals, environmental justice, or the Justice40 initiative. Following
the review, the Department will, to the greatest extent allowed by law, terminate
DOT programs—including funding agreements—found to be implicated by the orders.